[22:1] _Contemporary Review_, p. 8 [_ibid._ p. 11 f.]
[23:1] _Contemporary Review_, p. 8 f. [_ibid._ p. 11].
[23:2] _S.R._ i. p. 441.
[24:1] _Contemporary Review_, p. 8 f. [_ibid._ p. 12 f.]
[24:2] _S.R._ i. p. 387 ff.
[24:3] _Canon_, p. 112 f.
[24:4] _Contemporary Review_, p. 9, note [_ibid._ p. 12, n. 4].
[24:5] _S.R._ i. p. 360, note 1. Dr. Lightfoot, of course, "can hardly
suppose" that "I had read the passage to which I refer."
[25:1] _Contemporary Review_, p. 9 [_ibid._ p. 13].
[26:1] _Contemporary Review_, p. 9 [_ibid._ p. 13].
[26:2] I cannot go through every instance, but I may briefly say that
such a passage as "Ye are of your father the devil" and the passage
Matt. xi. 27 _seq_. are no refutation whatever of my statement of the
contrast between the fourth Gospel and the Synoptics; and that the
allusion to Paul's teaching in the Apocalypse is in no way excluded even
by his death. Regarding the relations between Paul and the "pillar"
Apostles, I hope to speak hereafter. I must maintain that my argument
regarding the identification of an eye-witness (ii. p. 444 ff.)
sufficiently meets the reasoning to which Dr. Lightfoot refers.
[27:1] _Contemporary Review_, p. 11 f. [_ibid._ p. 16].
[27:2] _Ibid._ p. 10 [_ibid._ p. 14].
[28:1] _S.R._ ii.
Pages:
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249