Sec. 235. It is true, he has annexed two limitations to it,
to no purpose:
First, He says, it must be with reverence.
Secondly, It must be without retribution, or punishment; and
the reason he gives is, because an inferior cannot punish a
superior.
First, How to resist force without striking again, or how to
strike with reverence, will need some skill to make intelligible.
He that shall oppose an assault only with a shield to receive the
blows, or in any more respectful posture, without a sword in his
hand, to abate the confidence and force of the assailant, will
quickly be at an end of his resistance, and will find such a
defence serve only to draw on himself the worse usage. This is
as ridiculous a way of resisting, as juvenal thought it of
fighting; ubi tu pulsas, ego vapulo tantum. And the success of
the combat will be unavoidably the same he there describes it:
----- Libertas pauperis haec est:
Pulsatus rogat, & pugnis concisus, adorat,
Ut liceat paucis cum dentibus inde reverti.
This will always be the event of such an imaginary resistance,
where men may not strike again. He therefore who may resist,
must be allowed to strike. And then let our author, or any body
else, join a knock on the head, or a cut on the face, with as
much reverence and respect as he thinks fit.
Pages:
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199